October 29, 2006 Sunday, SDRC
The retreat ended today. Our final assignment was to divide into pairs and tell our partner what insight we were going to take away from this retreat. I spoke about my difficulty with compassion. I shared my realization that the righteous indignation I feel and the anger I project out at different people, and the ideas or views they support, is because I feel powerless, sad, angry, or in some way suffer because of it. The anger I feel toward the treatment of hunting dogs, or even the hunting itself, causes me to suffer as a result of the feelings that arise from the thoughts I have about these issues. And in order to avoid the suffering that arises from my aversion, I get angry. The result is that I get a false sense of power. It is a power derived from an attitude of righteous indignation and will always superimpose itself over an experience of sadness or painful emotions.I came to recognize that as long as I continue to operate in this manner I will be unable to have real compassion for the animals, the hunters, and even myself. And that any skillful action on my part will be out of range. To have real compassion one must stand in the middle between the two feelings and be able to feel for both sides; a posture of equanimity. Otherwise I am simply aligning myself with one side or the other. And I will be forever separated from being able extend loving-kindness or skillfully administer compassionate action . Compassion needs equanimity not self righteous anger which is actually an avoidance reaction.
No comments:
Post a Comment