"The middle way avoids extremes, and threads its way between the opposites so lightly and so reasonably that no act is followed by reaction, and hence there is no need for a Self to suffer the consequences of the act. The perfect act has no result." – Christmas Humphreys, Karma & Rebirth, ISBN (US) 0 8356 0306 7
The way I understand this, the way it makes personal sense to me, is that "extremes" are the result of our living from an ego-center in which we read life in terms of our dualistic apprehension of likes/dislikes, right/wrong, and good/bad etc. This means our choices and actions are ego-driven and are not the result of a posture of equanimity. As a result, there are always consequences arising out of the opposite pole no matter which one we choose. Like a constant burr under one's saddle one might say.
On the other hand the "middle way" finds us acting only in response to what the universe presents us in each moment; the burr is removed. Following the middle way allows for actions that are so in line with "what is" that they yield no re-action to them. And this is the notion of "no result" as I interpret this statement.
So, this is why it is important for me to struggle to attain an equanimous posture in life. It leaves no footprint in the sand. Action responding to "what is" versus ego-preference creates no disturbance. With no disturbance in the flow of life, no action is detectable. I am "one with the flow."
A worthy intention shrouded in human difficulty.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment